Mapo-gu has 2 data centers listed on DataColoc, operated notably by Digital Realty, DAOU TECHNOLOGY. Compare colocation (rack, half-rack, 1U), pricing, certifications and connectivity, then get an instant costed estimate.
Server colocation in Mapo-gu (server housing) means installing your own servers in a rack or cabinet (42U) inside a secure data center: redundant power, cooling, 24/7 security and multi-carrier connectivity. DataColoc lists 2 data centers offering colocation in Mapo-gu, including Digital Realty, DAOU TECHNOLOGY. Its top-connected site lists 9 networks.
a full rack is priced on electrical power (kVA), IP transit and cross-connects. Compare the 2 data centers in Mapo-gu to get a costed quote.
None: “housing” and “colocation” mean the same thing — hosting your own servers in a third-party data center, as opposed to renting a dedicated server or public cloud.
Filter by certification (ISO 27001, HDS, PCI-DSS) in the comparator to keep only compliant sites.
Learn the basics: colocation, 42U rack, cross-connect, IP transit, Tier III/IV.
Costed answers: how much does a rack cost?, cross-connect pricing, colocation or cloud? — and the colocation price barometer.
Beyond listed prices, here is the computed cost of a standard 5 kW rack in Mapo-gu, from our open market model (published method, version 2026.07-v1):
| Item | Estimate |
|---|---|
| 5 kW rack, per month | €982 – €1,110 |
| Cost per kW per month | €174 – €197 |
| Over 3 years (36 months) | €35,352 – €39,960 |
Amounts are in euros: the model is computed in EUR, including for markets outside the euro area. We do not show a KRW conversion until a dated, sourced rate backs it.
What this covers: local industrial energy tariff, site efficiency (PUE), retail colocation margin and local market tightness. What it does not: IP transit, cross-connects, setup fees and PDUs — priced site by site in the comparator.
An estimate, not an offer. It is a model, with an open method and a version — not a contractual rate. A quote prices your actual configuration. Think the model is wrong? The method is published: tell us where.
Compare data centers in Mapo-gu →Mapo-gu has 2 data centers, operated by Digital Realty, DAOU TECHNOLOGY. Declared design level: Tier III. That level describes the building's redundancy, not a contractual availability commitment: only the contract carries one. Available formats range from 1 baie to 1 baie: you can start small here, without renting a whole rack.
9 networks are listed at the sites in Mapo-gu according to public interconnection registries. That number drives your negotiating power: every carrier inside the building is one more quote, with no civil works.
Note: part of the operation falls under a US-jurisdiction company, hence under the CLOUD Act. Hosting in Europe is not enough to escape it: what counts is the provider's nationality, not the building's address.
A city has no electricity of its own: the sites in Mapo-gu are connected to the national grid, itself interconnected with its neighbours. What is measured, and what decides, is therefore the country's generation mix. No single source dominates it: the largest, coal, supplies only 31.1% (2025). The detail: coal 31.1%, nuclear 29.6%, natural gas 27.9%, solar 6.1%, bioenergy 3.2%, oil (fuel oil, diesel) 1%. Fossil fuels (coal, gas, oil) account for 60% of it. A kilowatt-hour there weighs 417 g of CO2, i.e. 1.1 times less than the world average (458 g), 2025 figure. Concretely: a 3 kVA rack, in a site with a PUE of 1.5, draws 35,478 kWh a year and therefore emits 14.8 tonnes of CO2 a year here. The same rack, same hardware, same PUE, would emit 16 tonnes on a world-average grid. The building has nothing to do with it: the country does.
Source: Ember / Energy Institute via Our World in Data, retrieved 2026-09-14. A site under a direct renewable purchase agreement may show a different balance: that is for the operator to declare.
Since 1970, 0 earthquake of magnitude 5 or above has been recorded within 100 km of Mapo-gu, and 1 within 200 km. The strongest: magnitude 5.1 in 1982, 135 km away. This record covers 56 years, which is short on a seismic timescale: no recorded earthquake does not mean no hazard. It does not replace the statutory zoning, which alone binds construction.
Source: U.S. Geological Survey, ANSS ComCat, retrieved 2026-09-14. Measured from the median coordinates of the city's sites.
No Internet exchange point is listed here: traffic will run over transit bought from a carrier, which is billed by bandwidth. No rate is published by the operators in this city: pricing is on request, and we do not estimate it on their behalf.
The nearest site outside Mapo-gu is 4 km away, in Seoul (19 sites). Short distances matter: they drive the cost of a link between two buildings, and whether a backup site is workable.