Kharkov has 1 data center listed on DataColoc, operated notably by Maxnet. Compare colocation (rack, half-rack, 1U), pricing, certifications and connectivity, then get an instant costed estimate.
Compare data centers in Kharkov →The data center listed in Kharkov is operated by Maxnet.
4 networks are listed at the sites in Kharkov according to public interconnection registries. That number drives your negotiating power: every carrier inside the building is one more quote, with no civil works. 1 Internet exchange point is reachable from these sites, which cuts latency to the large content networks and the cost of transit. The large networks reachable directly from these sites, without buying transit, are Hetzner, OVHcloud, Meta, Akamai, Cloudflare: they are present at the exchange point where one site in the city is a point of presence. Reaching your cloud over an exchange point rather than the public Internet changes latency, and above all the price of data egress.
A city has no electricity of its own: the sites in Kharkov are connected to the national grid, itself interconnected with its neighbours. What is measured, and what decides, is therefore the country's generation mix. That grid draws 55.8% of its electricity from nuclear (2022). The detail: nuclear 55.8%, coal 20.9%, hydro 9.9%, natural gas 6.4%, solar 4.6%, wind 1.3%. Fossil fuels (coal, gas, oil) account for 27.8% of it. A kilowatt-hour there weighs 250 g of CO2, i.e. 1.8 times less than the world average (458 g), 2022 figure. Concretely: a 3 kVA rack, in a site with a PUE of 1.5, draws 35,478 kWh a year and therefore emits 8.9 tonnes of CO2 a year here. The same rack, same hardware, same PUE, would emit 16 tonnes on a world-average grid. The building has nothing to do with it: the country does.
Source: Ember / Energy Institute via Our World in Data, retrieved 2026-09-14. A site under a direct renewable purchase agreement may show a different balance: that is for the operator to declare.
No earthquake of magnitude 5 or above has been recorded within 200 km of Kharkov since 1970, according to the US Geological Survey's global catalog. This record covers 56 years, which is short on a seismic timescale: no recorded earthquake does not mean no hazard. It does not replace the statutory zoning, which alone binds construction.
Source: U.S. Geological Survey, ANSS ComCat, retrieved 2026-09-14. Measured from the site's coordinates.
With a single listed site, Kharkov cannot support a disaster-recovery plan spread over two separate buildings within the same town. A second site remains necessary, and it is found in the nearby cities listed below. No rate is published by the operators in this city: pricing is on request, and we do not estimate it on their behalf.
The nearest site outside Kharkov is 7 km away, in Kharkiv (3 sites). Short distances matter: they drive the cost of a link between two buildings, and whether a backup site is workable.