Rostov-on-Don has 2 data centers listed on DataColoc, operated notably by Alexander Galchenko, RTKomm-Yug. Compare colocation (rack, half-rack, 1U), pricing, certifications and connectivity, then get an instant costed estimate.
Server colocation in Rostov-on-Don (server housing) means installing your own servers in a rack or cabinet (42U) inside a secure data center: redundant power, cooling, 24/7 security and multi-carrier connectivity. DataColoc lists 2 data centers offering colocation in Rostov-on-Don, including Alexander Galchenko, RTKomm-Yug.
a full rack is priced on electrical power (kVA), IP transit and cross-connects. Compare the 2 data centers in Rostov-on-Don to get a costed quote.
None: “housing” and “colocation” mean the same thing — hosting your own servers in a third-party data center, as opposed to renting a dedicated server or public cloud.
Filter by certification (ISO 27001, HDS, PCI-DSS) in the comparator to keep only compliant sites.
Learn the basics: colocation, 42U rack, cross-connect, IP transit, Tier III/IV.
Costed answers: how much does a rack cost?, cross-connect pricing, colocation or cloud? — and the colocation price barometer.
Beyond listed prices, here is the computed cost of a standard 5 kW rack in Rostov-on-Don, from our open market model (published method, version 2026.07-v1):
| Item | Estimate |
|---|---|
| 5 kW rack, per month | €956 – €1,164 |
| Cost per kW per month | €170 – €208 |
| Over 3 years (36 months) | €34,416 – €41,904 |
What this covers: local industrial energy tariff, site efficiency (PUE), retail colocation margin and local market tightness. What it does not: IP transit, cross-connects, setup fees and PDUs — priced site by site in the comparator.
An estimate, not an offer. It is a model, with an open method and a version — not a contractual rate. A quote prices your actual configuration. Think the model is wrong? The method is published: tell us where.
Compare data centers in Rostov-on-Don →Rostov-on-Don has 2 data centers, operated by Alexander Galchenko, RTKomm-Yug.
11 networks are listed at the sites in Rostov-on-Don according to public interconnection registries. That number drives your negotiating power: every carrier inside the building is one more quote, with no civil works. 1 Internet exchange point is reachable from these sites, which cuts latency to the large content networks and the cost of transit.
A city has no electricity of its own: the sites in Rostov-on-Don are connected to the national grid, itself interconnected with its neighbours. What is measured, and what decides, is therefore the country's generation mix. No single source dominates it: the largest, natural gas, supplies only 44.7% (2025). The detail: natural gas 44.7%, coal 18.4%, nuclear 18.3%, hydro 16.7%, oil (fuel oil, diesel) 1.2%. Fossil fuels (coal, gas, oil) account for 64.3% of it. A kilowatt-hour there weighs 450 g of CO2, i.e. about the world average (458 g), 2025 figure. Concretely: a 3 kVA rack, in a site with a PUE of 1.5, draws 35,478 kWh a year and therefore emits 16 tonnes of CO2 a year here. The same rack, same hardware, same PUE, would emit 16 tonnes on a world-average grid. The building has nothing to do with it: the country does.
Source: Ember / Energy Institute via Our World in Data, retrieved 2026-09-14. A site under a direct renewable purchase agreement may show a different balance: that is for the operator to declare.
No earthquake of magnitude 5 or above has been recorded within 200 km of Rostov-on-Don since 1970, according to the US Geological Survey's global catalog. This record covers 56 years, which is short on a seismic timescale: no recorded earthquake does not mean no hazard. It does not replace the statutory zoning, which alone binds construction.
Source: U.S. Geological Survey, ANSS ComCat, retrieved 2026-09-14. Measured from the median coordinates of the city's sites.
No rate is published by the operators in this city: pricing is on request, and we do not estimate it on their behalf.
The nearest site outside Rostov-on-Don is 4 km away, in Rostov-na-Donu. Short distances matter: they drive the cost of a link between two buildings, and whether a backup site is workable.