Ibaraki-city has 1 data center listed on DataColoc, operated notably by Digital Realty. Compare colocation (rack, half-rack, 1U), pricing, certifications and connectivity, then get an instant costed estimate.
Colocation in Ibaraki-city (server housing) relies on one listed data center, operated by Digital Realty. Your servers are hosted in a 19" rack featuring redundant power, cooling, and 24/7 security. Its top-connected site lists 3 networks and 1 internet exchange point (IXP). For a wider choice, nearby cities and their distances are listed below.
DataColoc lists 1 data center offering colocation in Ibaraki-city (Digital Realty). The nearest alternatives are listed below, with their distance.
The site lists up to 3 networks and 1 internet exchange point (IXP). IP transit and cross-connects can be estimated based on your needs using the comparison tool.
No certification is declared yet; filter by certification (ISO 27001, HDS, PCI-DSS) in the comparator to widen to compliant nearby cities.
Learn the basics: colocation, 42U rack, cross-connect, IP transit, Tier III/IV.
Costed answers: how much does a rack cost?, cross-connect pricing, colocation or cloud? — and the colocation price barometer.
Compare data centers in Ibaraki-city →The data center listed in Ibaraki-city is operated by Digital Realty. Declared design level: Tier III. That level describes the building's redundancy, not a contractual availability commitment: only the contract carries one. Available formats range from 1 baie to 1 baie: you can start small here, without renting a whole rack.
3 networks are listed at the sites in Ibaraki-city according to public interconnection registries. That number drives your negotiating power: every carrier inside the building is one more quote, with no civil works. 1 Internet exchange point is reachable from these sites, which cuts latency to the large content networks and the cost of transit.
Note: operation falls under a US-jurisdiction company, hence under the CLOUD Act. Hosting in Europe is not enough to escape it: what counts is the provider's nationality, not the building's address.
A city has no electricity of its own: the sites in Ibaraki-city are connected to the national grid, itself interconnected with its neighbours. What is measured, and what decides, is therefore the country's generation mix. No single source dominates it: the largest, natural gas, supplies only 32.8% (2025). The detail: natural gas 32.8%, coal 32.1%, solar 9.8%, nuclear 9.1%, hydro 7.2%, bioenergy 5.3%. Fossil fuels (coal, gas, oil) account for 67.4% of it. A kilowatt-hour there weighs 477 g of CO2, i.e. about the world average (458 g), 2025 figure. Concretely: a 3 kVA rack, in a site with a PUE of 1.5, draws 35,478 kWh a year and therefore emits 16.9 tonnes of CO2 a year here. The same rack, same hardware, same PUE, would emit 16 tonnes on a world-average grid. The building has nothing to do with it: the country does.
Source: Ember / Energy Institute via Our World in Data, retrieved 2026-09-14. A site under a direct renewable purchase agreement may show a different balance: that is for the operator to declare.
Since 1970, 22 earthquakes of magnitude 5 or above have been recorded within 100 km of Ibaraki-city, and 81 within 200 km. The strongest: magnitude 7.2 in 1984, 182 km away. This record covers 56 years, which is short on a seismic timescale: no recorded earthquake does not mean no hazard. It does not replace the statutory zoning, which alone binds construction.
Source: U.S. Geological Survey, ANSS ComCat, retrieved 2026-09-14. Measured from the site's coordinates.
With a single listed site, Ibaraki-city cannot support a disaster-recovery plan spread over two separate buildings within the same town. A second site remains necessary, and it is found in the nearby cities listed below. No rate is published by the operators in this city: pricing is on request, and we do not estimate it on their behalf.
The nearest site outside Ibaraki-city is 6 km away, in Minoo-shi (2 sites). Short distances matter: they drive the cost of a link between two buildings, and whether a backup site is workable.