Chappaqua has 1 data center listed on DataColoc, operated notably by VPLS. Compare colocation (rack, half-rack, 1U), pricing, certifications and connectivity, then get an instant costed estimate.
Colocation in Chappaqua (server housing) relies on one listed data center, operated by VPLS. Your servers are hosted in a 19" rack featuring redundant power, cooling, and 24/7 security. Its top-connected site lists 1 network. For a wider choice, nearby cities and their distances are listed below.
DataColoc lists 1 data center offering colocation in Chappaqua (VPLS). The nearest alternatives are listed below, with their distance.
The site lists up to 1 network. IP transit and cross-connects can be estimated based on your needs using the comparison tool.
No certification is declared yet; filter by certification (ISO 27001, HDS, PCI-DSS) in the comparator to widen to compliant nearby cities.
Learn the basics: colocation, 42U rack, cross-connect, IP transit, Tier III/IV.
Costed answers: how much does a rack cost?, cross-connect pricing, colocation or cloud? — and the colocation price barometer.
Compare data centers in Chappaqua →The data center listed in Chappaqua is operated by VPLS.
1 network is listed at the sites in Chappaqua according to public interconnection registries. That number drives your negotiating power: every carrier inside the building is one more quote, with no civil works.
A city has no electricity of its own: the sites in Chappaqua are connected to the national grid, itself interconnected with its neighbours. What is measured, and what decides, is therefore the country's generation mix. No single source dominates it: the largest, natural gas, supplies only 40% (2025). The detail: natural gas 40%, nuclear 17.4%, coal 16.3%, wind 10.3%, solar 8.6%, hydro 5.3%. Fossil fuels (coal, gas, oil) account for 57% of it. A kilowatt-hour there weighs 384 g of CO2, i.e. 1.2 times less than the world average (458 g), 2025 figure. Concretely: a 3 kVA rack, in a site with a PUE of 1.5, draws 35,478 kWh a year and therefore emits 13.6 tonnes of CO2 a year here. The same rack, same hardware, same PUE, would emit 16 tonnes on a world-average grid. The building has nothing to do with it: the country does.
Source: Ember / Energy Institute via Our World in Data, retrieved 2026-09-14. A site under a direct renewable purchase agreement may show a different balance: that is for the operator to declare.
No earthquake of magnitude 5 or above has been recorded within 200 km of Chappaqua since 1970, according to the US Geological Survey's global catalog. This record covers 56 years, which is short on a seismic timescale: no recorded earthquake does not mean no hazard. It does not replace the statutory zoning, which alone binds construction.
Source: U.S. Geological Survey, ANSS ComCat, retrieved 2026-09-14. Measured from the site's coordinates.
With a single listed site, Chappaqua cannot support a disaster-recovery plan spread over two separate buildings within the same town. A second site remains necessary, and it is found in the nearby cities listed below. No Internet exchange point is listed here: traffic will run over transit bought from a carrier, which is billed by bandwidth. No rate is published by the operators in this city: pricing is on request, and we do not estimate it on their behalf.
The nearest site outside Chappaqua is 16 km away, in White Plains. Short distances matter: they drive the cost of a link between two buildings, and whether a backup site is workable.